Showing posts with label EU treaty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EU treaty. Show all posts

Friday, 19 October 2007

Brown sets course to push through EU constitution/ Treaty

"The Prime Minister briefed his Cabinet colleagues on Tuesday to expect another protracted tussle on the latest treaty, starting in the new year and continuing well into the spring, The Times has learnt.


He told them that months of detailed examination will dampen Eurosceptics’ opposition while demonstrating that the document is too complex to be decided by referendum. "


Saturday, 29 September 2007

Kent Conservatives Rally for EU referendum.



On Saturday, 22nd September, Maidstone town centre hosted the epicentre of the Conservative campaign to force Gordon Brown to keep his 2005 General Election manifesto pledge to have a referendum on the EU Constitution.

Conservative MEP’s Dan Hannan and Richard Ashworth were joined by Prospective Parliamentary Candidates and activities from across Kent, with events taking place in Rochester and Maidstone, and then across to Deal and Ramsgate.

The event gathered enormous public support, demonstrating that the British public are not prepared to put up with this Government telling them one thing and then going off and blatantly ignoring them once the elections are over.

Thanks to Janice Small for her contributions to the rallies and to this post

Tuesday, 25 September 2007

Never in the History of this Country!

Sign up to The Sun's Campaign
http://www.thesun.co.uk/section/0,,2004240000,00.html






Have your say, don't leave it to..............

Don't consider it a treat, to have a referendum on the treaty

Sunday, 9 September 2007

Why we should have a Referendum on the EU Treaty

Quite simply we need to get at the truth about Europe and what membership of the EU does for us and costs us. We need to get at the truth about what powers we have given away and just what further loss of control the new treaty means for the UK.

If we have a referendum then we can have a proper debate with the arguments set out so we can all have the opportunity to hear the case both for and against.

Reports on the cost of our membership vary considerably from the official Government figures which suggest we are in net profit, to independent sources such as the think tank Open Europe who suggest that our membership has cost £40b since 1998 (www.openeurope.org.uk/media-centre/article.aspx?newsid=2000). While the Institute of Directors have estimated the Net cost at 1.75% of GDP per annum, almost £15 billion per annum. (www.euro-know.org/articles/eumembership.pdf). Civitas predict the cost is even higher, between £17-40bn per year. (www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/EUCosts_Factsheet.pdf).

Looking at the cost of red tape and regulation since 1998, the British Chamber of Commerce found an extra cost of £55.66Bn to UK business and that 73% of this costs to business arose from EU legislation, furthermore they suggest that the Government cannot and does not challenge the figures. (http://www.chamberonline.co.uk/)

To try to put these figures in a real world human perspective, £15Bn would build us some where between 45 and 60 new hospitals. That’s no expensive tax payer pays later PFI’s.

Moving on from the costs, 6 out of 10 new UK laws are now simply rubber stamped from Europe. We are stuck with the Human Rights Act that leans towards the rights of the law breaker over the victims of crime. This act is enshrined in membership of the EU.
We cannot control our own immigration policy and struggle to deport criminals because of the primacy of EU law.
The EU landfill directive is responsible for the current local Government woes over rubbish collection and disposal as the directive can impose unlimited fines for exceeding limits on landfill. Though I am sure no one supports the use of landfill into the future as a method of rubbish disposal why should we be fined by the EU.

Sunday, 19 August 2007

EU Treaty Referendum


This is, to use the vernacular “a no brainer”.

No one living in the South East is under any illusion or pretence that they can rely on Gordon Brown to negotiate on our behalf.

We must have a referendum, and then we can all have the opportunity to listen to the debate and make up our own minds.